Definition: Thy right hand, O LORD, is become glorious in power: thy right hand, O LORD, hath dashed in pieces the enemy.
Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from Exodus 15:6. It’s a really powerful and dramatic passage about God’s victory over his enemies. Here's what it means in simpler terms: The Basic Story: This verse comes after Egypt has been defeated by the Israelites. They are facing a terrible invasion, and they’re feeling incredibly vulnerable and afraid. Let’s unpack it word-by-word: “Thy right hand, O LORD…” – This is a direct address to God. “Thy” means "your." So it's like saying, “God, I’m speaking to you.” “…is become glorious in power…” – This means God is now powerful and strong. He’s not just being powerful; he’s becoming powerful. “thy right hand, O LORD, hath dashed in pieces the enemy.” - This is the key part! "Dashed in pieces" is a very vivid image. It means God used his right hand to completely destroy and defeat his enemies – the Egyptians, the army, everything that was threatening them. What does it all mean? It’s a huge statement of victory. God isn't just fighting anymore; he's overwhelmingly winning. He's demonstrating his power in a way that feels incredibly significant and dramatic. It speaks to the idea that God is ultimately in control and can overcome any challenge. Important Context: This verse is part of a larger story about God’s deliverance of His people from slavery. It highlights God’s ability to protect, empower, and ultimately triumph over evil. --- Resources for Further Exploration (Optional): Bible Gateway: [https://www.biblegateway.com/resources/verses/Exodus%2015%206](https://www.biblegateway.com/resources/verses/Exodus%2015%206) – This lets you read the verse in different translations and see how it’s interpreted throughout history. Bible Explanations: [https://www.bible-explains.org/exodus/15/6](https://www.bible-explains.org/exodus/15/6) – This provides a more detailed explanation of the context and significance. Do you want me to: Explain another verse? Give you a different way of interpreting this passage?